CSS Counter Styles Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-07-18 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-counter-styles-3-20130718/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Accepted or Rejected and positive response
Rejected and no response
Rejected and negative response
Deferred
Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  Hebrew should re-use the 1-100 digits for 1k-100k, separated by geresh.
From:     Matitiahu Allouche
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 2. #
Summary:  Korean styles should have a negative indicator
From:     MURAKAMI Shinyu
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 3. #
Summary:  Spec says all Longhand CJK are negative-capable, but Korean isn't.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]
Response: 
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Spec's description of longhand CJK styles is slightly clumsy.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 5. #
Summary:  ethiopic-numeric step 5 is wrong.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 6. #
Summary:  CJK examples for 10, 11, 100, and 101 were wrong for some languages.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 7. #
Summary:  Treatment of cycles in 'speak-as' are undefined.
From:     Reece Dunn
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 8. #
Summary:  Suffix for Korean styles should be an ASCII comma, not ideographic comma.
From:     신정식 (Jungshik SHIN)
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 9. #
Summary:  Fix location of Predefined Counter Styles document
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 10. #
Summary:  Step 5 in the CJK algorithm isn't needed.
From:     MURAKAMI Shinyu
Comment:  
Response:

Issue 11. #
Summary:  Suggested changes to Chinese and Korean informal styles
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Response:

Issue 12. #
Summary:  Behavior of setting CSSOM @counter-style attributes to invalid values is undefined
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 13. #
Summary:  Missing 'speak-as' descriptor from CSSOM API for @counter-style
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 14. #
Summary:  What should the OM for @counter-style return for unspecified descriptors?
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 15. #
Summary:  Loops in the 'system:override' aren't specified.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 16. #
Summary:  'pad' should only apply to some styles
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: 
Issue 17. #
Summary:  'speak-as:auto' isn't handled correctly when 'system:override'.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 18. #
Summary:  Definitions of 'hiragana', 'katakana', and their -iroha variants doesn't match implementations.
From:     Richard Ishida
Comment:  
Response: 
Issue 19. #
Summary:  'pad' should count characters, not symbols.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Response: 
Issue 20. #
Summary:  upper/lower-roman styles should max out at 3999
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 21. #
Summary:  speak-as loops should only "fix" styles actually participating in the loop
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 22. #
Summary:  'symbolic' algorithm is wrong
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 23. #
Summary:  Spec is unclear about whether redefining the builtins affects built-in fallbacks.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Invalid

Issue 24. #
Summary:  Referring to 'character' for length limits is ambiguous.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 25. #
Summary:  'alphabetic' and 'symbolic' systems should generate no repr for 0, rather than doing fallback
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Comment:  
Response:

Issue 26. #
Summary:  'cjk-decimal' style shouldn't be defined for negatives, as there's no common negative sign.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Response: 
Issue 27. #
Summary:  It's not defined what to do if an unknown counter-style name is used in counter()/etc
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  
Response:

Issue 28. #
Summary:  Impls should be allowed to go past the complex CJK limits
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 29. #
Summary:  Spec should mention the minimum # of symbols requirement for symbols() function.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 30. #
Summary:  CSSCounterStyleRule#name setter should lowercase the built-in names.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 31. #
Summary:  symbols() values need to specify their 'pad' and 'speak-as' values.
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 32. #
Summary:  The term 'negative-capable' is confusing.
From:     David Baron
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 33. #
Summary:  "speak-as: auto" does the wrong thing for override systems.
From:     David Baron
Comment:  
Response: 
Issue 34. #
Summary:  'negative' and 'pad' interactions are contradictory
From:     David Baron
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: 
Issue 35. #
Summary:  English vs CJK spacing between marker and list item content
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: 
Issue 36. #
Summary:  Allow reading out counter values as words (alt text)
From:     James Craig
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: 
Issue 37. #
Summary:  Behavior of "range:auto" when extending a complex predefined style is undefined
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted

Issue 38. #
Summary:  Handle i18n of spoken counter styles better
From:     James Craig
Comment:  
Closed:   Deferred

Issue 39. #
Summary:  Name of 'override' system is confusing
From:     fantasai
Comment:  
Closed:   Accepted