Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)

• From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
• Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:05:19 -0800
• To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
• Cc: mnot@mnot.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120301100242.0a6565f8@resistor.net>

At 09:50 01-03-2012, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>Stephen and I just had a chat about this matter. He and I came up with a
>proposed paragraph to add after that list of bullet points:
>
>    In the initial phase of work on HTTP/2.0, new proposals
>    for authentication schemes can be made.  The WG will
>    select zero or more of those with a goal of choosing
>    at least one scheme that is better than those available
>    for HTTP/1.x.  Non-selected schemes might be discussed
>    with the IETF Security Area for further work there.

If the WG selects zero, how can it meet the goal of choosing at least 
one scheme?

Regards,
-sm 

Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 18:07:50 UTC