Re: Moving forward on improving HTTP's security from Julian Reschke on 2013-11-13 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:47:03 +0100
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <528366B7.4080201@gmx.de>

On 2013-11-13 12:43, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> On 13 Nov 2013, at 7:03 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>>> 745	4) Requre secure underlying protocol for HTTP/2.0 (at least in web browsing)
>>> 746	
>>> 747	[ weaker for can't live with ]
>>
>> Are you saying that 4) == C), and that 4) was about using https only?
>
> In a nutshell, yes.

I'm still confused. What you say implies that http: URIs will not use 
HTTP/2. We did *not* discuss this as option 4.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 11:47:36 UTC