Re: #305 Header ordering from Patrick McManus on 2013-11-22 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:23:17 -0500
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNqowwcPGcRaThZ5BEd9n=s1H8iWUdzNOP3Y6f11amatKQ@mail.gmail.com>

:)


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 21 November 2013 14:59, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I suspect we'll both remain biased towards each of #1 and #3.
> > Thankfully, in either case the marginal difference is small and both #1
> and
> > #3 are substantially better than #2.
>
> Yep.  Time for RFC 3929 procedures.  No sense in restricting all the
> fun in RTCWEB to just that group.
>

Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 01:23:50 UTC