Re: Large Frame Proposal from Jeff Pinner on 2014-07-09 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 20:20:08 -0700
To: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
Cc: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_hjgwYTQD1C7Xftz=PnwrhdCVTVRFyRd1=pThUgxAPn5A@mail.gmail.com>

> Hey Jeff,
>
> How is this different to you from dynamically adjusting the header table size?
>

I see it differently because the compressor (at least in my
implementation and so I realize I definitely could be biased) lives
above the framing codec. The low-level framer emits "header block
fragments" to the session processing code which then emits "header
fields" to the application.

Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 03:20:37 UTC