- From: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:12:45 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 9 July 2014 02:39, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Please be specific about what you like about this proposal -- > > a) Getting rid of the reference set (Jeff's "1", maybe "4") is a good idea, and complementary to Greg (et al)'s proposal > b) This complete set of changes is a preferable alternative to Greg (et al)'s proposal > c) Don't know, need to talk more. I'm at a). I won't miss the reference set. If we're genuinely worried about whether the loss of the reference set is a time-bomb, I suggest we consider PHK's negotiation of header compression proposal.
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 07:13:12 UTC