Re: willchan's thoughts on continuations, jumbo frames, etc after *only skimming* the threads from Mark Nottingham on 2014-07-11 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:10:22 +1000
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
Message-Id: <4459829B-A8E0-4297-949F-6120E3C73DB6@mnot.net>

On 11 Jul 2014, at 3:39 pm, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

>  if the WG does decide that headers MUST be fragmentable and interleaveable, then the solution is to send them over a segment in DATA frames (or a HEADER frame that works exactly like DATA frames)

It sounds like you're advocating for Jeff's proposal:
  http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+pLO_ieYC8Sbvk7dNqd2+mtQOn2qxBkrUSxp+9VrTDrzQcFXQ@mail.gmail.com


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 06:10:51 UTC