Re: PRIORITY extension from Poul-Henning Kamp on 2014-07-14 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:52:33 +0000
To: Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>
cc: "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <86789.1405349553@critter.freebsd.dk>

In message <CAPyZ6=Jpe8q5Q0OSVy=mV=JyX4MP4EVWYVxat1OkgPjpuR=KLg@mail.gmail.com>, Tatsuhiro Tsujik
awa writes:

>Are you saying that we should separate PRIORITY as standalone document and
>be referenced from h2 core spec?  Then it is not an *extension* RFC.  They
>are in core spec but just in separate documents, so as the HPACK.

Purely from a textual point of view, that would be a good idea no matter
what status the priority stuff gets.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 14:52:56 UTC