Re: http/2 and "extensions"

• From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:54:38 -0700
• To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
• Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CABkgnnVA7LBP4rS5xZ9pCt8nOu=oRiwNC1FkvU9+2SBvFhejSQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 15 July 2014 10:41, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> all extensions going to be optional-to-implement[?]

all extensions ARE going to be optional-to-implement.

You can't rely on other implementations supporting something that they
don't know about.  The extensibility features of HTTP (header fields,
content types) are available if you want something end-to-end.

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 17:55:07 UTC