- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:56:24 +0000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CABP7RbeGA3vVzFXrdPVjYBwuLWixs2FaSLecJe6gSCtQ-bK2Qw@mail.gmail.com>, James M Snell wr ites: >Regarding the privacy claims specifically, there's >are a ton of things someone can learn given nothing but the method and >routing information. Let's not fool ourselves into thinking that even >the most rudimentary activity information is somehow "safe" from >disclosure. My point is that a lot of that information is already leaked by TLS and by carefully choosing to leak a little more, we may be able to protect the rest a lot better. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 17:56:47 UTC