Re: #537: Remove segments (consensus call) from Martin Thomson on 2014-07-15 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:27:17 -0700
To: Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV+WjqTzehgVPwo=bACUonxP2Z9Jicwf0fPgoOQSXNAeA@mail.gmail.com>

On 15 July 2014 14:20, Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org> wrote:
> Seriously, though, there's no particular need now to send HEADERS frames at
> random points during a stream's lifecycle (after the initial
> HEADER/CONTINUATION block, of course). Why allow it at all? Make it a
> GOAWAY-able (or at least RST_STREAM-able) offense.

Would that make it easier for you to ensure that you correctly process streams?

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 21:27:44 UTC