Re: http/2 and "extensions" from Martin Thomson on 2014-07-15 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:48:05 -0700
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXxXUqSmXzQ_2VE5==bSdutBVPZBOBWzctLrydY8AHJ9g@mail.gmail.com>

On 15 July 2014 14:46, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:
> My feeling, coming from my encoded data thing, is that the more "real" the
> extension (i.e. not just communicating nice-to-know metadata, but actually
> doing something semantic), the more design and text is going to be dedicated
> to dealing with unsupportive or broken peers.

Which leads back to a preference for a new protocol label at that point.

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 21:48:32 UTC