Re: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues

On 18 Jul 2014 12:47, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> 1) Your preferred outcome (if any)

A for ease of implementation. Also because unlimited size requests are
already de facto broken in 1.1 due to intermediaries like squid having
fixed upper limits on parsing.

> 2) Whether you can live with the other option, and if not, why

I can live with b

> "I have no preference" is useful information too.
>
> If you indicate you can't live with one (or both) of the options, you
MUST give a detailed, relevant reason as to why; omitting the reason means
your "can't live with" will be ignored.
>
> Thanks,
>
> P.S. Please state *your* preference, not what you think the WG can live
with.
>
> P.P.S. This is not a call for more discussion; please resist replying to
others' preferences.
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>