Re: Getting to Consensus on 1xx Status Codes (#535)

On Jul 18, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> The only reason we don't have more 1xx codes is because I haven't seen
> a need for any more, and neither has anyone else.

Er, well, I should probably mention 103 Checkpoint

  https://code.google.com/p/gears/wiki/ResumableHttpRequestsProposal

though I will probably go back to forgetting it exists tomorrow.

....Roy

Received on Friday, 18 July 2014 23:22:50 UTC

Follow Lee on X/Twitter - Father, Husband, Serial builder creating AI, crypto, games & web tools. We are friends :) AI Will Come To Life!

Check out: eBank.nz (Art Generator) | Netwrck.com (AI Tools) | Text-Generator.io (AI API) | BitBank.nz (Crypto AI) | ReadingTime (Kids Reading) | RewordGame | BigMultiplayerChess | WebFiddle | How.nz | Helix AI Assistant