- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:32:28 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <53CD2386.5020306@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >On 2014-07-21 15:37, Martin Thomson wrote: >> On 21 July 2014 06:29, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >>> ...again, if we do things like that please do not couple it with "?". Just >>> have two parts that get concatenated verbatim to reconstruct the full >>> path+query. >> >> I don't know how to act on that. Are you suggesting that a 1.1 to 2 >> gateway would be unable to perform any separation? > >No. It's about the fact that making a privacy-related decision based on >what's in the path and what's in the query is misguided. Uhm, the primary argument is compression ratio. Privacy will only be relevant if we go further in HTTP/3. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 14:32:53 UTC