Re: Recovery from decompression failure (was: Re: Cost analysis: (was: Getting to Consensus: CONTINUATION-related issues)) from Martin Thomson on 2014-07-22 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:20:13 -0700
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVT_Q1Hrf1X98Az+_qqAaxzv8NGB0qZgV6dkp+ENW1xpA@mail.gmail.com>

On 22 July 2014 05:45, Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> wrote:
> That's exactly what I proposed (I checked the spec, seems to be allowed
> to send two settings in one frame).

Yes, that is specifically allowed (we want to permit stateless
processing of settings).

I'll note that the change needs to be acknowledged in a header block
with an encoding context update.

Received on Tuesday, 22 July 2014 16:20:40 UTC