Re: Moving RFC7238 (308 Status Code) to Proposed Standard

• From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
• Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 13:54:13 +1000
• To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
• Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <9B8E8069-0B95-451B-93E8-AC0F254BD0C3@mnot.net>

There seems to be broad support for this in the WG, Barry.

Regards,


On 28 Jul 2014, at 12:40 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> In Toronto, we discussed moving RFC7238 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7238> from Experimental to Proposed Standard, now that it is implemented in most browsers.
> 
> The WG in the room seemed to think that doing so is a good idea; anyone here have a reason to believe otherwise?
> 
> See also:
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-http-status-code-308-ps/
> 
> Cheers,
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 03:54:43 UTC