- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:28:47 -0700
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 6 August 2014 23:01, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > Note that I can see at least one use-case for long held idle stream. > Basically it is the long polling use-case of "protocol abuse". Frameworks > will still long poll over http2 and would benefit from a bit more certainty > over how long an idle stream can be expected to live. I can even imaging > more creative protocol abuse where a long held stream is used to enable push > promises to be sent, thus allowing arbitrary resources to be sent from > server to client. No way anyone would do that... https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-webpush-http2-00
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 17:29:15 UTC