I can potentially see why it might be interesting to learn about the
difference between shifting load and upgrades of various sorts. But
if that is all that you need, then we probably want to limit the
information to just that.
Knowing where the information came from is a common marketing
requirement, but separable. Do you really believe that you will have
so many sources of leads that you will have to have some sort of
...Referer... that allows you to identify bad leads?
Incidentally, based on some other discussions that I've had, I've
basically concluded that the privacy leak isn't much alleviated by the
reduction in entropy on this field, so I'm open to re-opening that
discussion if you feel that would make this more straightforward. But
I think that I'd still be pushing for a reduction to zero, which would
remove what is a non-trivial disincentive to use Alt-Svc in some use
cases.
On 22 August 2014 15:38, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org> wrote:
> For discussion of Received on Saturday, 23 August 2014 00:06:37 UTC