Re: HPACK WGLC feedback

> The one *editorial* comment I have is that having the two tables called
"static table" and "header table" is very confusing.
> Is there a reason why it's not simply "static table" and "dynamic table"?

​+1 That's exactly how I named corresponding classes in my implementation.​



On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> so I just read this (the current version checked into git) end-to-end, and
> don't have any substantial comments. I might if I actually tried to
> implement it, though.
>
> The one *editorial* comment I have is that having the two tables called
> "static table" and "header table" is very confusing. Is there a reason why
> it's not simply "static table" and "dynamic table"?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>