LC process, was: h2 priority

• From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 20:44:47 +0200
• To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
• CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <5406101F.9030904@gmx.de>

On 2014-09-02 19:27, James M Snell wrote:
> ...
> It's my turn to disagree here. The point of last call is to broaden
> the review to a much larger community. It's entirely reasonable and
> expected to receive feedback on issues that had been tracked,
> discussed and resolved previously by the WG. In fact, I think that's
> pretty much a given.
> ...

Reminder: this is "just" the WGLC. There will be another LC, the 
IETF-wide one. Do not assume that there won't be any new feedback at 
that stage.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 18:45:25 UTC