Re: h2 use of Upgrade

• From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:18:48 -0700
• To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
• Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CABkgnnX63Ks3G=P3hj+sUHLAT3ZmK9yO9b7e+H4zcJ0DaBaDqg@mail.gmail.com>

On 31 August 2014 20:16, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> Note that the SETTINGS frame is a sufficient response if the request
> was for OPTIONS.

Are you suggesting that we wouldn't provide an HTTP-level response
(other than the 101) to the OPTIONS request?

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 22:19:16 UTC