Re: RST_STREAM(OK) after an HTTP response

• From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
• Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:11:39 -0700
• To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
• Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CA+pLO_j_k6YAqt-Jxrxk0---eXQF8Y9ngBVx39dp-5ZcrOJ+jw@mail.gmail.com>

> While I understand the scenario, it seems more appropriate for the client to send the RST_STREAM(OK) if it decides to abort sending the rest of the body.

I think that should be valid as well. Basically I think either should
be able to tear down the stream via RST_STREAM(OK) without the other
considering it an error, and that the text should be clarified to make
it explicit.

Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 16:12:10 UTC