Re: Working Group Last Call The ORIGIN HTTP/2 Frame

• From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:11:25 +1000
• To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
• Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Bence Béky <bnc@chromium.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>
• Message-ID: <CABkgnnUE8gciL9Gh1BSc8mz0-t11Zbr9Jih+G=xniZ_Vi3VmHA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> On 26 Sep 2017, at 9:59 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think that
>> we should also write down that ORIGIN SHOULD be sent before any
>> responses and that once responses have been received, the client MAY
>> assume that the server doesn't support ORIGIN.
>>
>> Is that a fair assessment of where we are at?
>
> Are we starting to use a frame for something that would be better expressed as a setting?

I do try to avoid adding mechanisms, but I think that you are right
here.  An I_WILL_SEND_ORIGIN flag would avoid any messing around.

Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2017 05:11:48 UTC