[Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)

[Raymond Hettinger]

> > I haven't seen this mentioned, so I'm going to throw in my
suggestion.
> >
> > The following makes sense to me, uses previously invalid syntax, and
> > uses the '.' punctuation in a way similar to existing/proposed
usage:
> 
> -1. This violates my "syntax should not look like grit" rule.

Also, the dot prefix should probably be kept free in case a WITH
statement is ever introduced.


Raymond