[Python-Dev] Decorator syntax J2 (decorate..def),
with implementation
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Mon Aug 16 02:19:22 CEST 2004
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 19:58, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> What about the variant which makes the block optional when there is only
> one decorator?
Better, but I'm still not crazy about it, mostly because of the new
keyword. I think you'd have to add an __future__ to get it into Python
2.4.
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : [Python-Dev] Decorator syntax J2 (decorate..def),
with implementation
Next message: [Python-Dev] Decorator syntax J2 (decorate..def),
with implementation
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list