[Python-Dev] Decorator syntax J2 (decorate..def), with implementation

[Robert Brewer]

Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 19:58, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> 
> > What about the variant which makes the block optional when 
> > there is only one decorator?
> 
> Better, but I'm still not crazy about it, mostly because of the new
> keyword.  I think you'd have to add an __future__ to get it 
> into Python 2.4.

...which Guido hasn't completely ruled out (unlike most of the other
'potential' alternatives):
fumanchu at amor.org