[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 318 & Community Consensus
David Goodger
goodger at python.org
Mon Aug 30 18:05:42 CEST 2004
[Fredrik Lundh]
> David Goodger wrote:
>> It may confuse users who don't expect a block to contain bare
>> expressions.
>
> blocks can contain bare expressions today, and such
> expressions are evaluated, but the results are discarded.
> plain function calls belong to this category, for example.
Corrected in CVS & on the web.
>> On the other hand, the ``@`` syntax is bound to cause at least as
>> much confusion.
>
> and that qualifies as an unbiased observation in exactly in what
> way?
Perhaps in trying to balance the text I overshot. Removed.
--
David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 318 & Community Consensus
Next message: [Python-Dev]
Re: [Python-checkins] python/nondist/peps pep-0318.txt, 1.28, 1.29
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list