Instagram would have been successful even if Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg had never purchased the photo-sharing app for $1 billion in 2012, co-founder Kevin Systrom said during the FTC’s landmark antitrust trial on Tuesday.
Systrom, who was called to the stand by the FTC, testified that Instagram was experiencing explosive user growth prior to Zuckerberg’s acquisition offer. The 41-year-old also said he was confident Instagram could have eventually rolled out features like video and private messages without Facebook’s help.
As Instagram grew, Systrom testified that Zuckerberg began to treat the app’s success as a “threat” to Facebook. In one instance, Instagram did not receive any new headcount to improve its data privacy practices despite a companywide effort to do so after the Cambridge Analytics scandal.
“I thought that that was not appropriate given the scale of Instagram,” Systrom said, according to Bloomberg.
The testimony lent support to the FTC’s core claim that Meta used a “buy or bury” strategy to stop upstart apps like Instagram and WhatsApp before they could directly threaten its social media empire. The agency has asked the court to force Meta to spin off the apps.
In a 2017 email shown in court, Systrom grumbled to a colleague that Instagram hadn’t received additional employees despite a companywide push to expand video offerings.
