Politics

Obama admin’s ‘treasonous conspiracy’ in Trump-Russia probe referred to DOJ by Tulsi Gabbard

WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice has taken possession of a criminal referral by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, outlining what she called a “treasonous conspiracy” by the Obama administration to “subvert President Trump’s 2016 victory.”

On Friday, Gabbard made public boldest yet” Russian influence campaign on the American electorate.

“Their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people,” Gabbard said in a Friday X post. “No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The integrity of our democratic republic depends on it.”

The Department of Justice reportedly received a criminal referral from the Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealing what she called a “treasonous conspiracy” by the Obama administration. Bloomberg via Getty Images

“We are turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral,” Gabbard warned.

A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment to The Post on the receipt of the referral, which was first reported Monday by Fox News.

After the report’s release, Trump reposted a video to Truth Social that featured a compilation of Democratic leaders declaring “No one is above the law” — and ended with an AI-generated clip of Obama being arrested in the Oval Office as the “YMCA” blares in the background.

Trump later charged Obama and other members of the former president’s administration are a “major threat to our country.”

“Obama himself manufactured the Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX,” the president wrote on Truth Social. “Crooked Hillary, Sleepy Joe, and numerous others participated in this, THE CRIME OF THE CENTURY!. Irrefutable EVIDENCE. A major threat to our Country!!!”

Gabbard made more than 100 pages of records public Friday showing the efforts by Obama officials to bury intelligence in the final weeks of the 44th president’s administration. Getty Images

Gabbard’s exposé revealed that — both before and after Hillary Clinton’s 2016 defeat — members of the US Intelligence Community concluded: “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.”

“We have no evidence of cyber manipulation of election infrastructure intended to alter results,” read other findings drafted Dec. 7, 2016.

But neither of those assessments were placed in the Presidential Daily Brief after the FBI, under then-Director James Comey, informed then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s office it was going to “dissent” from the draft’s conclusions “based on some new guidance.”

On Dec. 9, Obama met with Clapper, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, CIA Director John Brennan and others in the Oval Office, “tasking” each to look into “Russia Election Meddlin.” Getty Images

On Dec. 9, Obama met with Clapper, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, CIA Director John Brennan and others in the Oval Office, “tasking” each to look into “Russia Election Meddling” in the presidential contest between Trump and Clinton.

The administration officials later produced an intelligence assessment that claimed: “Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election.”

Tulsi Gabbard's Russiagate claims

Tulsi Gabbard’s claims of election interference focus on the controversial 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, which President Barack Obama ordered his intel chiefs to compile.

The report fueled the Russiagate investigations against President Trump. Gabbard alleges it amounted to a political hit job, claiming Obama officials knowingly used shaky intel and then lied about it.

Gabbard’s new claims are based on a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, which she has publicly released. Its findings differ in some key ways from both the Obama report and a previously released Senate Intelligence Committee report.

Democrats, however, point to the Senate report, which was backed by then-Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) — now Trump’s secretary of state. That supports some of the findings of the Obama report.

Here are the biggest points — and what the dueling intel reports say:

The Steele dossier

  • The House report contradicts the claims of Obama officials that they never relied on the discredited Steele dossier — which was compiled by Hillary Clinton’s campaign — as part of the Russiagate investigation.
  • In a 2017 House hearing, Obama CIA Director John Brennan denied that his agency used the Steele dossier for intelligence assessments.
  • However, the full Steele dossier was still included as an attachment to the Obama intel report, the newly public House report found.
  • Additionally, according to the House report, Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe pushed to use the Steele dossier for the Obama intel report.
  • Senior intel officials also confronted Brennan about the legitimacy of the Steele dossier, the House report said, but he shrugged it off. Brennan’s response was reportedly, “Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?”
  • The Senate investigation found that the Steele dossier was not used as part of the Obama intel report.

Obama’s involvement

  • Gabbard claimed Wednesday that Obama ordered the creation of the 2017 intel report and suggested it “was subject to unusual directives directly from the president and senior political appointees.” She added: “Obama directed an intelligence community assessment to be created, to further this contrived false narrative that ultimately led to a year-long coup to try to undermine President Trump’s presidency.”
  • The 2020 Senate intel report confirmed that Obama ordered the report to be drafted, but did not comment on the political motivations.
  • Obama said that “the bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.”

Did Putin want Trump to win?

  • The Obama report said that “Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability” and that Putin had a “clear preference for President-elect Trump.”
  • But the House report contradicted this, saying that Putin’s “principal motivations in these operations were to undermine faith in the US democratic process.” The Russian strongman also seemed to expect Clinton to win, and held back on “some compromising material for post-election use against the expected Clinton administration.”
  • The Senate report said lawmakers were given “specific intelligence reporting to support the assessment that Putin and the Russian Government demonstrated a preference for candidate Trump.”

Did Russia alter the 2016 election?

  • To buttress her claims that the Obama intel report was political interference, she highlighted the findings of multiple intelligence agencies that Russia “had neither the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of the US election.”
  • On this, all three reports are in agreement.

“Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency,” the assessment added. “We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.”

The information relied in part on a dossier created by former MI6 spy Christopher Steele, an opposition research document funded by Clinton’s campaign that included allegations of the Kremlin blackmailing Trump after he purportedly cavorted with prostitutes in Moscow, according to Gabbard.

The spy chief’s findings lean on details dredged up by an Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) whistleblower who previously told superiors there was “no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count through cyber means.”

The Obama officials later produced an intelligence assessment that claimed: “Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election.” Getty Images
“The effect of what President Obama and his senior national security team did was subvert the will of the American people,” Gabbard said in a Fox News interview Sunday. Corbis/VCG via Getty Images

“The effect of what President Obama and his senior national security team did was subvert the will of the American people, undermining our democratic republic, and enacting what would be essentially a years-long coup against President Trump,” Gabbard told Fox News Sunday.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the vice chairman of the chamber’s Intelligence Committee, has downplayed the significance of the declassified DNI records, pointing to an earlier, bipartisan Senate report from 2020 that found “the Russian government directed extensive activity against U.S. election infrastructure” before the 2016 election and “used social media to conduct an information warfare campaign” to benefit Trump.

Allies of the 47th president have claimed that the Obama administration’s actions could amount to a conspiracy against rights, a crime which has no statute of limitations and can earn an individual up to 10 years in federal prison.

li,.wp-block-nypost-editor-primary-tag .inline-module--more--list ul>li{padding-left:unset}.wp-block-nypost-editor-primary-tag .inline-module--follow ul>li:before,.wp-block-nypost-editor-primary-tag .inline-module--more--list ul>li:before{content:none}

Follow Lee on X/Twitter - Father, Husband, Serial builder creating AI, crypto, games & web tools. We are friends :) AI Will Come To Life!

Check out: eBank.nz (Art Generator) | Netwrck.com (AI Tools) | Text-Generator.io (AI API) | BitBank.nz (Crypto AI) | ReadingTime (Kids Reading) | RewordGame | BigMultiplayerChess | WebFiddle | How.nz | Helix AI Assistant