➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2004-08-16 04:28 by anthonybaxter, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg22075 - (view) | Author: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter)  |
Date: 2004-08-16 04:28 | |
PEP 291 says that xmlrpclib should be 1.5.2 compatible. This patch: revision 1.31 date: 2003/10/31 13:49:36; author: loewis; state: Exp; lines: +66 -2 Patch #531629: Add multicall support. however, introduced code with the 'yield' keyword. This is completely and utterly non-1.5.2 compatible. Either the PEP (and the comment in the file) should be updated, or the code should be rewritten to not use yield. Martin? You checked in the patch, what's your opinion? |
|||
| msg22076 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *  |
Date: 2004-08-20 07:34 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 After discussion with /F, I have now bumped the minimum supported version to 2.1; fixed in xmlrpclib.py 1.34 and pep-0291.txt 1.11. Fredrik still has 1.5.2 installations he needs to support, but thinks he can manage maintenance on xmlrpclib for these on his own. |
|||
| msg22077 - (view) | Author: Anthony Baxter (anthonybaxter) |
Date: 2004-08-20 07:43 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=29957 The code, however, still has 'yield' in it, and is therefore _not_ 2.1 compatible. |
|||
| msg22078 - (view) | Author: George Yoshida (quiver) |
Date: 2004-08-21 15:48 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=671362 Should I close bug #842600 as a duplicate? (Although it was submitted last November.) |
|||
| msg22079 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2004-08-22 16:05 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 This is now fixed in xmlrpclib.py 1.35. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:06 | admin | set | github: 40764 |
| 2004-08-16 04:28:59 | anthonybaxter | create | |