Peter Singer

Writing for PS since 2001
223 commentaries
1 videos & podcasts

Peter Singer, Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University, is Founder of the nonprofit organization The Life You Can Save. His books include Rethinking Life and Death, One World Now, The Golden Ass. In 2013, he was named the world's third "most influential contemporary thinker" by the Gottlieb Duttweiler Institute.

Sort by: Latest Popular Show: All On Point

Feed People, Not Factory Farms
Chris McGrath/Getty Images

Feed People, Not Factory Farms

Aug 8, 2023 Peter Singer points out that even with Russia’s blockade of Ukraine’s grain exports, the world produces enough food for all.

Peter Singer on Russian protests, animal testing, AI, and more

Peter Singer on Russian protests, animal testing, AI, and more

Jul 18, 2023 Peter Singer considers ordinary Russians’ ethical obligations regarding the Ukraine war, worries that artificial intelligence will undermine the welfare of billions of animals, highlights controversial ideas worth discussing, and more.

The Coming Disruption of Animal Production
Bernd Weißbrod/picture alliance via Getty Images

The Coming Disruption of Animal Production

Jul 11, 2023 Peter Singer touts the growing promise of cultured substitutes to displace a cruel, inefficient, and destructive industry.

Can We Compare Pain Across Species?
Lukas Schulze/Getty Images

Can We Compare Pain Across Species?

Jun 13, 2023 Peter Singer shows that ethical concerns about the suffering we inflict on nonhuman life invite more difficult questions.

Half a Century of Animal Liberation Is Not Enough
Paula Bronstein/Getty Images

Half a Century of Animal Liberation Is Not Enough

May 16, 2023 Peter Singer explains why he is publishing a thoroughly revised and updated edition of his classic book.

45 pages

What Is Missing from the Inequality Debate

What Is Missing from the Inequality Debate

Oct 6, 2021 Peter Singer & Maciej Kuziemski show that no push for equality is complete without accounting for the needs of future generations and other species.

1 pages

The Two Dark Sides of COVID-19
Mar 2, 2020

We are not trying to "smuggle" anything in -- it's obvious from our title that we are saying that there is a second "dark side" to COVID-19, and the text makes it clear that we think that animals ought to receive moral consideration. We don't know what you mean by "clean cut scientific arguments," but all policy recommendations must start from ethical premises.

Charles Driver Mar 8, 2020

Definitely, but you're mixing ethical premises that are, to at least some people, distinct -- one regarding the wellbeing of humans, the other regarding that of animals. Getting your foot in the door by leveraging current events and a widely accepted premise, only to then spring a less popular premise on people, might lead one to wonder to what extent the arguments genuinely concern the first premise / current events...

kim southwood Mar 9, 2020

Humans do or don't make ethical choices based on their own observations. To encourage an ethical choice based on observations of the role of human/animal interaction in triggering the COVID-19 outbreak is useful. Those who disapprove of this article's ethical consideration might well label it as a "shrill animal activist manifesto" or as advancing "a less popular premise". For many it supports a deeply help ethical choice to advance pleasure rather than pain. The authors achieve this with a spotlight on cold, stark reality.

A new reply to this comment has been posted.

A new reply to this comment has been posted.

Tilly Vacher Mar 6, 2020

Very well said Peter Singer. If my father, Jon Wynne-Tyson, were able he would say so too.

A new reply to this comment has been posted.

The Migration Dilemma
Jul 8, 2018

Perhaps I wasn't clear, but I did not intend to suggest that Trump faces a moral dilemma. The moral dilemma is faced by his Democrat opponents. Even if net immigration to the US has declined, as it has in Europe, the Democrats cannot afford to allow Trump to succeed in branding them as soft on illegal immigration. That could cost them the election, and bring about the disaster of a second Trump term.

Rodrigo Garcia-Verdu Jul 8, 2018

Thank you for the clarification, Mr. Singer.

A new reply to this comment has been posted.

Peter Schaeffer Jul 8, 2018

I guess "abolish ICE" is really a hard-line position on immigration. The Democrats (most of them) aren't "soft on immigration". They are way beyond "soft on immigration". They don't believe in the very idea of borders. Why should they? Immigrants provide the Democrats with cheap labor, cheap votes, cheap virtue-signaling, and a massive new constituency for expanding the welfare state. What's their not to like? What could possibly go wrong?

A new reply to this comment has been posted.

Why Loving Our Animals Is Not Enough
Jun 11, 2018

Easy for you to say that the dog's suffering while you are at work is of little consequence. How does the dog feel about that? I think all suffering matters. So does joy, of course. The question is the balance between them, and whether it can be made more positive.

Crime and No Punishment for the Iraq War
Apr 8, 2018

Censored by whom?

Petey Bee Apr 9, 2018

By the moderation staff, I assume - the ones who filter out the incoherent ad-hominems and hate speech that every comment section on the internet attracts. They do a great job keeping this comment section civil, no disrespect to them.

The article was about Blair contemplatnig a return to public life, and how his wealth of experience would be welcome. I suggested that the appropriate venue for his return would be the ICC. Reason being that he was instrumental to selling the Iraq War to the American public and especially to legislators and the business class. We love a nice English accent here, and G.W. Bush isn't the most convincing person, so Blair's role was indispensible.

Whether the case for that war was outright fraud or extreme negligence is debatable. But at the time I had a hard time conceiving of a thought process that would justify rewarding either one. "Can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs" wasn't working for me at that time.

I can see how it is offensive to put the man's most significant legacy to the world in such a negative light. I was a little surprised that this all was controversial enough to cross the line. It's really ok, just an interesting marker of where "responsible discourse" lies.

A new reply to this comment has been posted.

Countering Islamic Extremism
Mar 12, 2015

On the contrary, I have protested against NATO's failure to have sufficient respect for the lives of innocent civilians - see, eg, my Project Syndicate column "What Price an Afghan Life?" April 1, 2011.
But to say that ISIS have killed only a handful is clearly false. Just today the Iraqi forces that have re-taken Tikrit have uncovered mass graves containing the bodies of hundreds of soldiers massacred by ISIS at Camp Speicher.

2 pages

Never miss a commentary by Peter Singer