Contents
  • Intro
  • Previous: SC 3.2.1 [On Focus]
  • Next: SC 3.2.3 [Consistent Navigation]
  • -

    On Input:
    Understanding SC 3.2.2

    3.2.2 On Input: Changing the setting of any user interface component does not automatically cause a change of context unless the user has been advised of the behavior before using the component. (Level A)

    Intent of this Success Criterion

    The intent of this Success Criterion is to ensure that entering data or selecting a form control has predictable effects. Changing the setting of any user interface component is changing some state in the control that will persist when the user is no longer interacting with it. So checking a checkbox or entering text into a text field changes its setting, but activating a link or a button does not. Changes in context can confuse users who do not easily perceive the change or are easily distracted by changes. Changes of context are appropriate only when it is clear that such a change will happen in response to the user's action.

    Note: This Success Criterion covers changes in context due to changing the setting of a control. Clicking on links or tabs in a tab control is activating the control, not changing the setting of that control.

    Specific Benefits of Success Criterion 3.2.2:

    Examples of Success Criterion 3.2.2

    Techniques and Failures for Success Criterion 3.2.2 - On Input

    Each numbered item in this section represents a technique or combination of techniques that the WCAG Working Group deems sufficient for meeting this Success Criterion. The techniques listed only satisfy the Success Criterion if all of the WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements have been met.

    Sufficient Techniques

    1. G80: Providing a submit button to initiate a change of context using a technology-specific technique listed below

    2. G13: Describing what will happen before a change to a form control that causes a change of context to occur is made

    Note: A change of content is not always a change of context. This success criterion is automatically met if changes in content are not also changes of context.

    Additional Techniques (Advisory) for 3.2.2

    Although not required for conformance, the following additional techniques should be considered in order to make content more accessible. Not all techniques can be used or would be effective in all situations.

    Common Failures for SC 3.2.2

    The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 3.2.2 by the WCAG Working Group.

    Key Terms

    changes of context

    major changes in the content of the Web page that, if made without user awareness, can disorient users who are not able to view the entire page simultaneously

    Changes in context include changes of:

    1. user agent;

    2. viewport;

    3. focus;

    4. Web page.

    Note: A change of content is not always a change of context. Changes in content, such as an expanding outline, dynamic menu, or a tab control do not necessarily change the context, unless they also change one of the above (e.g. focus).

    Example: Opening a new window, moving focus to a different component, going to a new page (including anything that would look to a user as if they had moved to a new page) or significantly re-arranging the content of a page are examples of changes of context.

    user interface component

    a part of the content that is perceived by users as a single control for a distinct function

    Note 1: Multiple user interface components may be implemented as a single programmatic element. Components here is not tied to programming techniques, but rather to what the user perceives as separate controls.

    Note 2: User interface components include form elements and links as well as components generated by scripts.

    Example: An applet has a "control" that can be used to move through content by line or page or random access. Since each of these would need to have a name and be setable independently, they would each be a "user interface component."