ISSUE-154: SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews?

AC review default confidenitality

SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Process Document

Raised by:

Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile

Opened on:

2015-01-30

Description:

This should be a tiny issue, so I hope we can resolve it in passing.

In section 8.1.1 on AC reviews it says [1]
[[[The Team must provide two channels for Advisory Committee review comments:

+ an archived Team-only channel; this is the default channel for reviews.
]]]

Does there need to be a default channel?

I would suggest not, others have suggested it is helpful - and others have suggested it is helpful if it is to publish it to the world.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: New Process Draft... - diff without must, should ... (from [email protected] on 2015-03-06)
2. Re: New Process Draft... (from [email protected] on 2015-03-06)
3. RESOLUTION: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-24)
4. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-09)
5. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-09)
6. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-09)
7. Should there be a Public Channel for AC Review Comments (was ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154) (from [email protected] on 2015-02-09)
8. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-09)
9. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-09)
10. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-09)
11. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-08)
12. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-08)
13. ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from [email protected] on 2015-02-08)
14. List of Process Document Issue Not Currently Covered in the Process 2015 Draft being reviewed (from [email protected] on 2015-02-08)
15. RE: w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-02-07)
16. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-02-04)
17. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-02-04)
18. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-02-03)
19. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-02-03)
20. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-02-03)
21. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-02-02)
22. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-02-01)
23. RE: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-01-30)
24. w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from [email protected] on 2015-01-30)

Related notes:

Display change log