Jump to content

argument from marginal cases (Q651439)

From Wikidata
philosophical argument for animal rights stating that, since human marginal cases (infants, the senile, the comatose, and the cognitively disabled) have direct moral status, so do animals
  • argument from species overlap
edit
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    argument from marginal cases
    philosophical argument for animal rights stating that, since human marginal cases (infants, the senile, the comatose, and the cognitively disabled) have direct moral status, so do animals
    • argument from species overlap

    Statements

    0 references

    Identifiers

    1 reference
    0 references
     
    edit
    edit
      edit
        edit
          edit
            edit
              edit
                edit
                  edit

                    Follow Lee on X/Twitter - Father, Husband, Serial builder creating AI, crypto, games & web tools. We are friends :) AI Will Come To Life!

                    Check out: eBank.nz (Art Generator) | Netwrck.com (AI Tools) | Text-Generator.io (AI API) | BitBank.nz (Crypto AI) | ReadingTime (Kids Reading) | RewordGame | BigMultiplayerChess | WebFiddle | How.nz | Helix AI Assistant