Talk:2024 Greenfield tornado

2024 Greenfield tornado is currently an Earth sciences good article nominee. Nominated by Departure– (talk) at 15:41, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: 2024 EF4 tornado in Iowa, U.S.

March 11, 2025

Featured article candidate

Not promoted

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 July 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Iowa portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance).

Failed verification

Hey @Sumanuil: The tornado is still on the Damage Assessment Toolkit (DAT). The DAT is an interactive map. It only automatically shows the latest 5-7 days. You have to change the date to when the Greenfield tornado occurred. I did just check and it is still there, so the reference doesn’t fail any verification. You can change the date at the top right of the website. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 05:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did change the date. It gave me zilch. Maybe it's my computer? Is there a URL that would give those results automatically? - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 06:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly no direct link. I often set the date to a few days before and after a tornado. Sometimes the National Weather Service offices enter the date as the survey date or make an error and enter a date before the tornado when trying to correct for a previously entered survey date as the date for the tornado. I just took this screenshot, so maybe set your dates like I have. Also, make sure you are 06:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's less than ideal. Maybe there should be a note alongside that reference? - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 18:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The dat doesnt save dates. Iy you link it to a certain date, it will not do that. 2600:1014:B100:6AC1:0:56:DA88:6701 (talk) 22:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image

As the image in the infobox is up for deletion, I propose we add a frame from Reed Timmer's amazing drone footage of the tornado, a film that has itself been reported on by a few other sources. Alternatively, are any images from Greenfield itself and the tornado's peak intensity known to exist? From what I can tell, the drone footage was taken around 10-15 minutes before the tornado hit Greenfield, and I haven't seen any images of the tornado in the city itself. Does anyone know if the DOW team has an image of that? Departure– (talk) 20:19, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Realistically, peak intensity was near the windmill footage, but lack of proper DIs screwed it up. In addition, AFAIK there are no known photos of it in Greenfield. I might try and get the DOW team to release a radar shot to PD. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 06:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Email sent to Wurman, not expecting a reply though. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 06:12, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good news and bad news.

Good news: I got pictures

Bad news: I'm a dumbass and there's already a DOW image in there. Not sure about peak intensity though. Also not PD. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 02:39, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! Anticomp said that radar images are inherently PD per 03:31, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Wildfireupdateman: @EF5: I found one! 16:59, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Per FAC, we're going to go with the Reed Timmer video unless some kind soul donates a free image of the storm. Still a good image, though. Departure– (talk) 18:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced the image with a screenshot from 15:16, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Name

@Departure–: I recommend looking at the Greensburg tornado (a GA for one) for an example on how this format works when referred to frequently as such in studies and by townsfolk. Frankly that does not destroy the flow at all. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 14:22, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See the centralized discussion at WP:WPWX that I've started as any consensus there will apply to more articles to avoid having a dispute like this in the future. Departure– (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]