Jump to content

User talk:Thriley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Incomplete DYK nomination

[edit]

16:37, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-10

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 02:28, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Frank Fritz

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frank Fritz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft missing required translation attribution

[edit]

Information iconit:Ken Scott (stilista) to Draft:Ken Scott (fashion designer). While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
Please also note that the copyright requirments underlying translation attribution apply to all articles and drafts, including drafts that are never released as an article. If you have any questions, please feel free to reply below, or ask for help at the Teahouse or WP:Help desk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:03, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the same thing applies to your translation at Draft:Andreas Englisch. For this draft, I have provided retroactive attribution for you, in this edit, of 08:10, 4 March 2025. If there are other articles or drafts of yours that represent translations from other Wikipedias and lack translation attribution in the edit history, these must be added, even if a long time has passed. If there are a great many of them, a tool is available to add retroactive attribution en masse; if it is only a small number, it is probably easier to just do them by hand, like I just did. Ask for help if you need it. Going forward, please always add translation attribution to your edit summary at the time of translation; for proper wording, see WP:TFOLWP. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:15, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Just realized you are a very senior editor. Sorry for the templates, but they do include a lot of information that would be tedious to type out. Also, although the licensing requirement was always there afaik, some of the specifics of what kind of operations require attribution (copying and translating from sister projects), and where to place it (the edit summary/page history), as well as the specific wording to use in each case (WP:CWW and WP:TFOLWP when done on time, and WP:RIA when catching up after the fact) only developed much later, and you might have missed the memo. So, sorry about the somewhat impersonal templates, but the info they present is important. As this is policy with legal implications, it sits above normal policy and guidelines, and has to be dealt with. Ping me if you need support or assistance. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This is follow-up to this comment of yours in section § Finishing school for articles below where you stated that you already attributed translated content you added to Westend Synagogue; this follow-up is more appropriate in this section than there.

Actually, your attempts to include attribution were unfortunately not enough as they do not comply with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. To provide proper attribution, you should add a dummy edit to that article, and include wording in the edit summary similar to that given at WP:RIA. A more detailed explanation follows. Please read it, as this is about a Wikipedia policy with legal implications and may not be ignored.

You are no doubt familiar with the hierarchy of force or compulsion underlying Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and other informational pages, where policy must almost always be followed, with very rare exceptions; guidelines represent Wikipedia consensus, but may occasionally be ignored for good reason; informational and Help pages are suggestions for best practice but not compulsory, and essays are pure editor opinion, with no compulsive force at all. Even a policy can be ignored sometimes, based on Pillar Five of our core principles, WP:IAR.

However, did you know that standing above policy is something even stronger, that may never be ignored under any circumstances? These are policies with legal implications. There are very few such, but include such things as libel, child protection, legal threats, and in particular, copyright, which has numerous aspects and (among other things) informs the licensing requirements for copying or translating content from one Wikipedia article to another. These requirements for translation attribution derive from the Wikimedia Terms of Use, and are explained for us non-legal humans primarily at WP:Copying within Wikipedia, which explains where to place the notification (in the edit history) and what wording to use. Unfortunately, although the spirit of your previous attempts to attribute the translation was in the right place, they are actually non-compliant and still require attribution in a form that meets the requirement.

The editing guideline WP:Copying within Wikipedia interprets the policy and suggests wording to use for this, in particular, see WP:TFOLWP, which has the following suggested edit summary to attribute a French translation:

  • Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

If such an edit summary was absent from the original edit, then the wording is different; in that case, the wording is given at WP:RIA:

  • NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

It is this latter model that needs to be added to the edit history of an article that lacks translation attribution, including, for example, Westend Synagogue. Can you please add it, using a dummy edit? Going forward for your new articles, please add the wording in the top example to the edit summary of the same edit where you add translated content. This is important; if there is anything that is unclear, please ask. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:07, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. I will follow this policy closely going forward. Best, Thriley (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Great. That just leaves the issue of past translations that still require attribution to be added. Fortunately, that is much less onerous than it used to be, due to a new, bot-like procedure that can provide attribution en masse to a list of articles, so you don't have to do them one by one. It starts from a list containing the English Wikipedia article name, the translation timestamp, and the foreign Wikipedia article it came from. To make the process easier for you, I have created User:Thriley/translations for you by extracting information from your contribution history via regular expressions. It's possible that the list has mistakes, or is incomplete. Please go over it, and fix up any problems or omissions you see, or note them at the Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:18, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just FYI: I added subpage /translation drafts for the ones you created in Draft space. Please have a look and lmk if you see any problems. In particular, I assume these are all translations, so if any of them are *not* a translation of a foreign Wikipedia article, please flag them. Mathglot (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

[edit]

I looked at the Kulturkaufhaus. It's mentioned on 2 pages, so I am reluctant of investing much time. How about a stub with the basics and leave the advertising details to the German article? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the references: some lost, one is from the house itself, some badly formatted, - not much left to build on, perhaps the two Tagesspiegel articles (one of them not marked as such). Nothing left about the architecture. - The synagogue (below) is perhaps worthier to invest time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:28, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for looking. A stub certainly would be fine for now. I was surprised it had no English article when I went to Wikipedia to learn about it recently. Thriley (talk) 20:33, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Westend Synagogue moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Westend Synagogue, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:15, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draft space undone; restored to Mainspace. See next section. Mathglot (talk) 10:43, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finishing school for articles

[edit]

So, the good news, is that Westend Synagogue is clearly a notable topic, which means it is worthwhile for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thanks for starting it! That said, there are a number of problems with it, that prompted another user to remove it from the encyclopedia:

  • It had the wrong title. We use English titles at English Wikipedia, per WP:AT and WP:UE. I have fixed the previous foreign title, so it is now in English.
  • It was unattributed. Translations from other Wikipedias *must* have proper attribution added to the edit history. See WP:CWW for details, and WP:TFOLWP for suggested wording. If you forget, you can add attribution retroactively, per WP:RIA. This is a *must*, and has to be dealt with. See section § Draft missing required translation attribution above for details.
  • When creating any new English article that exists already on another Wikipedia (whether it is a translation or not) you should link it to the foreign article(s) via Wikidata using the language links. I have done this for you, linking it to de:Westend-Synagoge.
  • It is an WP:ORPHAN, meaning, no articles link to it, so nobody will ever find your article and read it. It's a waste of your time to create articles that are orphans; please take the time to add links to your new article from others. See WP:ORPHAN or how to find in-lnks and add them.
  • There were no outgoing links. In order to fully integrate the article into the encyclopedia, you should add links to other articles. (Some have since been added by two editors.) See WP:LINK.
  • It requires additional citations. The only two citations are WP:BAREURLs, and they need to be upgraded to full citations, and more citations need to be added.
  • Before updates, it was an uncategorized stub. This has been fixed with the addition of several categories.

Because of the parlous state it was in, another editor removed the article from mainspace, where you created it, and moved it to draft space. I undid this move, restoring your article to mainspace because it is clearly WP:Notable, but I understand why they did that, and it was a defensible move. Please now get to work on fixing the remaining issues with this article, so that it is worthy to remain among the encyclopedic articles at Wikipedia. When you create new articles going forward, please be sure to keep these points in mind. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:43, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I did attribute the origin of the content, I just did so with a casual "From German Wikipedia." I also included the proper attribution on the article talk page to state that I had translated content from the article in German. I meant to expand the article later, which has been done now somewhat. I appreciate the assistance. Best, Thriley (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, Thriley. The casual, "From German Wikipedia" is a helpful reminder to you, and the {{translated page}} template on the article Talk page is nice to have, but neither complies with the translation attribution requirement that is part of Wikipedia's licensing requirements. As this topic is less about improving the article, and more about copyright compliance which is a different animal, I have followed up in detail at the earlier discussion about this topic: see subsection § Translation attribution is part of a policy with legal considerations. Please read it carefully. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nicholas Dames

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicholas Dames, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Philosophize This!

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philosophize This!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Poelpolder (Haarlem)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Poelpolder (Haarlem), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rosalie van Breemen

[edit]

Hello, Thriley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rosalie van Breemen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:15, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:National Partnership of New Americans

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Partnership of New Americans, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your machine translations

[edit]

Thriley, may I ask you to list which languages you speak or read well enough to do a translation from a foreign Wikipedia article into English? You can use the {{Babel}} template for this if you wish on your user page.

Looking at your contributions, you appear to have translated articles from Arabic, Cebuano, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Farsi, French, German, Hebrew, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malaysian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Tajik, Ukrainian, Uzbek, and Vietnamese. Unless you are a hyperpolyglot, you must be translating from languages you do not know, presumably using machine translation to do so.

This is problematic with respect to accuracy of content, because at best, a translated article is only as good as the original, and articles at other Wikipedias often are of lower quality than at English Wikipedia, or have problems of sourcing or accuracy. In addition, if the articles use citations to foreign sources that you cannot read, then we don't know if the article is verifiable which is potentially a serious problem. Please limit your translations to languages you known well enough to verify are correct in the original, and to know when machine translation gets it wrong (which happens all the time). Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:14, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wed March 12: Wiki Gala NYC

[edit]
March 12: Wiki Gala @ Prime Produce
Wiki-fashion show, Singapore

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community and visitors from the global Wikimedia Foundation for our Wiki Gala at Prime Produce in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan. All are welcome!

This is a sequel to the March 2024 Wiki Gala at Prime Produce, the March 2023 Grand Central Salon and the March 2022 Wiki-Tent Brunch.

The event will feature thematic video art installations and our traditional Wiki-fashion show, for which you are encouraged to dress in your finest Wikimedia clothing and accessories (bags, buttons, even books), or clothing connected to the topics you edit on wiki projects.

All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Photography Policy.

Meeting info:

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:18, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hurricane Helene disaster relief

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hurricane Helene disaster relief, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for Reverting my edit on Pilar Del Rey, I don't know why it happened. It may be due to Tool error. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 06:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vincent Eltschinger

[edit]

Hello, Thriley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vincent Eltschinger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 03:24, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Défense de la langue française

[edit]

Hello, Thriley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Défense de la langue française".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:28, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sergei Vershinin

[edit]

Hello, Thriley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sergei Vershinin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:24, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charles F. Delzell

[edit]

Hello, Thriley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Charles F. Delzell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:24, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:David Kunzle

[edit]

Hello, Thriley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David Kunzle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:24, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of companies founded by women

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of companies founded by women, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Brian Ketcham

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brian Ketcham, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anna Bloda

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anna Bloda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Margaret Miner

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thriley. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Margaret Miner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #670

[edit]

Follow Lee on X/Twitter - Father, Husband, Serial builder creating AI, crypto, games & web tools. We are friends :) AI Will Come To Life!

Check out: eBank.nz (Art Generator) | Netwrck.com (AI Tools) | Text-Generator.io (AI API) | BitBank.nz (Crypto AI) | ReadingTime (Kids Reading) | RewordGame | BigMultiplayerChess | WebFiddle | How.nz | Helix AI Assistant